An outstanding classroom library is something I’ve always
wanted to have but have not ever been quite able to achieve and maintain to the
standards discussed in this chapter.
Most recently, moving states and switching grade levels has put me in
the position of starting my classroom library over from scratch, twice. At the beginning of each school year, when I had a larger book
selection, I always had my new group of students organize my classroom library as part of our review of genres. This also served as a way to get them
familiar and excited about the books available in our classroom. I would have them make a list of books in
their journals they were interested in reading as we worked on organizing books
by genre and topic. Students couldn’t
wait to get their hands on the books once we finished organizing. Routman’s chapter reinforced the value in
doing this. I have never had my library
organized by reading levels. Over the years I have felt the pressure to
level my books based on reading programs being used at the school or district
level, but I never quite seem to get that far.
This chapter helped to relieve the pressure of the need to do this. I agree when Routman talks about the
importance of paying attention to students’ interests and de-emphasizing
leveled books. I can remember going to the public library as an elementary
school student and choosing books I liked based on those that were displayed
and caught my interest or based on topics I enjoyed. These books were not leveled. My teachers
never told me I had to choose books with a certain colored dot or reading
range. I never considered the level of a
book when choosing them, but I was somehow able to find books appropriate to my
reading abilities. Programs like AR can sometimes pigeon hole students into a certain level, and they often feel discourage to reach beyond their level. How else
can we build our knowledge and vocabulary unless we are challenged with text
that we read? If a student is interested
in a book, their engagement will help them to overcome some of the challenge a
book might present. This belief was
supported by the quote from this chapter “reading comprehension test scores are
more influenced by students’ amount of engaged reading than any other single
factor”.
This chapter also helped to further motivate me in my goal
to incorporate more reading into the content areas. I would like to include “math reading” into
my “Daily 4” math stations. I am on the
hunt for math content books that engage students in the text but also require
them to apply problem solving skills.
Overall, this chapter reinforced many of my own theories and beliefs. My classroom library continues to be a work
in progress but am encouraged that I am on the right track.
Isn't is satisfying to see a practice you've done mentioned in a professional development book? It give us validation that what we are doing must be helping students! What better way for students to learn about genres than by immersing themselves in books and figuring out on their own what makes books similar? If you are looking for math titles, I have a basket of "math" books in the Literacy Lounge that I have collected over the years. You are welcome to borrow them anytime you wish! Great post!
ReplyDeleteI will be visiting the Literacy Lounge very soon to borrow some of those books! Thank you!
ReplyDelete